Thinking about some RPG..Android version.

[fireside]

I looked at the cobweb.  I can barely see it in gimp so I don't think I could do any better.  I did rotate the vertex points, I think the way Egon was saying:
https://rapidshare.com/files/996541640/cobweb.obj

[Thomas.]

And what this?

[EgonOlsen]

I looked at the cobweb.  I can barely see it in gimp so I don't think I could do any better.  I did rotate the vertex points, I think the way Egon was saying:
https://rapidshare.com/files/996541640/cobweb.obj

No, that's not what i meant...what i rather meant is this...this is how the model is done right now (think of the wall being attached on the right side of the web):

Code Select Expand


***********
|--------|*
| \      |*
|  \     |*
|   \    |*
|    \   |*
|     \  |*
|      \ |*
|--------|*


...and what i want is this:

Code Select Expand


***********
|--------|*
|      / |*
|     /  |*
|    /   |*
|   /    |*
|  /     |*
| /      |*
|--------|*


[EgonOlsen]

And what this?

This is a great example of the OBJ-format being fucked up beyond believe...this file uses negative vertex indices in the triangle definition list. I've no idea what to make from that and so the import fails. However, i've converted it in another program (which could handle these negative indices)...i like the model, but i can't use it because it doesn't play well with the way i'm using to animate the mesh in the shader.

[fireside]

OK, I took the two on the left, moved them to the right and moved the vertex's back over the web.  I think that's the equivalent, as long as I don't have right and left mixed up with up and down.  I can't actually see it on the model.  It's just black, but I can see the vertices on the texture. 
https://rapidshare.com/files/345413650/cobweb.obj

[EgonOlsen]

Yes, thank you. That's what i meant. Animation looks better now.

[EgonOlsen]

I've re-done the cobweb-texture. It now looks like this:

[fireside]

That does look a little better.

[Hrolf]

Much better scale - that's what I wanted! I'd knock a few strands out to make it look more old and ragged though, it's a bit too 'perfect' as it is... ...or am I just being a perfectionist?! 
Thinking about it, it's not right! What are those radial strands attached to? It should look more like this: (but better).

[fireside]

What are those radial strands attached to?

Yeah, I actually thought the same thing but it looked so nice, I didn't mention it.  Yours would be more realistic, but, everything doesn't have to be perfectly realistic either.  It could be a very industrious spider that crossed to the other side and anchored it.

[EgonOlsen]

Much better scale - that's what I wanted! I'd knock a few strands out to make it look more old and ragged though, it's a bit too 'perfect' as it is... ...or am I just being a perfectionist?! 
Thinking about it, it's not right! What are those radial strands attached to? It should look more like this: (but better).

You are right...but it was the one that i could find for this purpose...i'll look again or maybe draw my own. It can't be that hard...

[EgonOlsen]

Another try:

[Hrolf]

Sweet!

[EgonOlsen]

Anybody interested in creating a low polygon variant of this: http://www.turbosquid.com/FullPreview/Index.cfm/ID/504610?

[Thomas.]

I'll look at it tomorrow...